> -----Original Message----- > From: Sergio Pissanetzky [mailto:[email protected]] > > JOHN> What connects the two? > SERGIO> The action functional. Which, by the way, does exhibit the > "butterfly effect" (I published it). >
OK. That's why I like this list, always learning something new from the people that know. > > JOHN> . but somehow maintaining an operating paradigm across > engagements. > SERGIO> My operating environment is Physics. I subscribe to the paradigm of > Physics. > Well, I was thinking more of, say you have two systems, each one has its own computational intelligence efficiencies based on a computational model. Say a system of stars and a system of neutrons. An observing intelligence of each would model them locally and efficiently then be able to switch between the two models. You could use physics to explain both but computing intelligence within each might not be perfectly aligned with absolute physical systems. In fact it probably wouldn't. There would be a particular "meta" language involved. Then - that paradigmatic interloper that switched between the two meta-languages, and others, is the fancy footwork I was referring to. > So, IMO, once the AGI machine is built, all the work is in supplying it with the > causal information that led to those products, one at a time, remove the > entropy to cause self-organization, and compare the human results with > what the AGI did. I admit this is a lot of work, but is much easier than writing > computer simulations for each one of the products. My approach is very > different from all others. It is more like a child that goes to school and learns > for years and years until one day she learns about disengaging systems, > changing computational models, etc. And is able to understand it because > she has acquired the necessary background. My approach does that > naturally, no other approach I know of can do it. > > Your approach is? I think how it works is we borrow from one computational model and apply that to the other even though it might not be related in the hopes of achieving some goal. An example might be a football coach that tries to manage fashion models. It's a funny example but you get what I mean. Somehow switching between the models generally works out due to overriding mathematics and physics, but it may or may not work out well. John ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
