On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree with Matt's analysis, regarding the AGI list
>
> For a while we had a greater number of experienced, "professional" AGI
> researchers on here (not trying to discount the value of newbies, just
> making an observation).  But they mostly, got driven away via the
> trolling, for example by
> ...
> -- a spate of posts a while back about how someone had received the
> secret to solving P=NP via divine inspiration

...

Thank God I finally realized that I don't have to worry about being taken
seriously anymore!

By the way, I never said that I had received the secret to solving P=NP via
divine inspiration.  What I said was that I thought there was a possibility
that I received divine inspiration that I would (eventually) solve the
problem (through my own hard work) but since it was so unlikely that I
would actually be able to do so it would stand as rational evidence that I
did receive some kind of divine inspiration if I did solve it.  This is
different than your characterization.

After a number of years working on the problem I haven't been able to find
a path to resolving it, so I have to conclude that there is no rational
evidence that I did receive divine inspiration on this.  However, the
problem is interesting to me and I am certain that it is at the heart of
the AGI problem so am continuing to work on it regardless of what the
"professional" AGI researchers who once posted here may have thought.

At first I was worried that you were going to mention me on your list but
then, as I read on, I started to worry that you might not. I am happy to be
part of a fringe group because it means we are not working on something
that is easy.

Jim Bromer



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to