A better bet would be: "I will wager $100 that NO breakthrough will arise."
Why single out this list for lack of strong AI progress?? Place that $100 bet back at the Dartmouth conference. We'll turn it over to the professional AI researchers! On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:18 AM, John G. Rose <[email protected]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Eric B. Ramsay [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> I will wager $100 that NO breakthrough will arise from any of the persons >> who are frequent contributors to this list. >> > > I think the list has paralleled multiple evolutionary "breakthroughs" in > AGI. They may not have been formalized on the list but they have been > discussed. This is not a formal list, yet. > > "Breakthroughs" meaning making progress in people's minds on their thinking > of various scientific, philosophical and technical aspects of AGI. > > John > > > > ------------------------------------------- > AGI > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
