ONE FUCKING EXAMPLE.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Grimes
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 1:58 PM
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Behold your saviour, Ben
Mike Tintner wrote:
Absolutely. All mathematical and logical and algorithmic systems (in
themselves) are completely, eternally non-creative, non-generative. They
are all dead recipes with rigid rules that have never and could never
produce a single new ingredient or element - because quite obviously
they are not designed to be creative. They are recipes with set,
exclusive mixtures of ingredients.
Mike mike mike mike mike....
WHAT are we going to do with you? =\
You are generally right about a lot of things but at other times you
demonstrate a woeful ignorance. =(
The GOERTZEL wasn't very helpful either, his counterexample obviously
missed the deeper point...
What I need you to do is to obtain some books on theoretical computer
science and compilers (I can suggest some titles if you need them...).
Basically, what creativity does is manipulate the parse tree at some
intermediate level so that, instead of being purely random (quadrillions
of permutations), you only have to chose from maybe a few hundred
alternatives, making it easy to home in on what you're looking for. But
yeah, you need to learn about how mathematical languages work...
--
E T F
N H E
D E D
Powers are not rights.
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/6952829-59a2eca5
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
