Aaron, Don't take it personally.  Be free.   It may be just a lack of vision on 
Mike's part, or a psychological / physiological disposition towards narcissism: 
 an actual inability to see  things from perspectives other than his own.   It 
may just be undiagnosed.  No matter.
Then again, I've never met him, but Mike Tinter may not actually be a real 
person, he could just be someone pulling your chain in a made up account.  I 
don't know. 
Be free, and prove by demonstrating the working prototype.  No one can argue 
with success.  Well, actually they can, because intelligence is that elusive 
thing that we haven'tyet acquired. And to some, once it's defined, that is no 
longer is intelligence. 
Cheers, and good luck on your enterprise.  Learn something and share it. 
~PM.
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:04:42 -0500
Subject: Re: [agi] The Fundamental Misunderstanding in AGI [was Superficiality]
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

You won't stop saying I'm being abstract until I show you the code actually 
doing it. If you're not going to be satisfied with anything but the final 
results, I guess you'll just have to wait and see. I'm not going to bother 
explaining anything else to you, because when I do, you say I didn't. I'm just 
going to tell you that your unfounded, nonsensical claims are just that.

My system, once implemented, *can* understand the first 3 of those sentences, 
using mechanisms I've already started working on and described to you. (This is 
because I already knew language was "an unbelievably complicated thing", and I 
chose semantic nets specifically because they *are* up to the challenge.) As 
for the fourth, it's a shortcoming of my parser, not the system I'm building on 
top of it, that it doesn't *yet* look at similar words when a sentence makes no 
sense. When I have time, I'll revisit the parser to add this (easy to 
implement, but computationally expensive) functionality, but it's not my focus 
right now.

So, if you want to continue on the attack as if I haven't rebutted every single 
accusation of inadequacy you've made, go for it. I don't have to answer to you 
anyway, and I'm not going to keep doing it of my own free will when it 
accomplishes nothing. I'm tired of this silly game, and I'm going to go have 
some real conversations with people who bother to listen and think about things 
before they reject them out of hand, and who bother to give a specific *reason* 
they are rejecting them, instead of saying nothing more informative than "you 
suck" or "your ideas/tools suck".





                                          


-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-c97d2393
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-2484a968
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

<<attachment: Untitled[1].jpg>>

Reply via email to