> -----Original Message----- > From: David Clark [mailto:[email protected]] > > You obviously arent a professional programmer! Looping through patterns > is exactly what programming and CS is all about. If all code could just be > executed sequentially, then all programs would last less than 1 second and > wouldnt be very useful. >
I am. You are missing my point. Let me put it more succinctly. To accomplish a particular task when writing a program a human software engineer will accomplish the task in one way during one attempt. An advanced intelligence would write the program in a "better" way, agree? What is better? If one looks at resources consumed while the application is running to accomplish a goal that is a form of being better if it uses generally less resources, while at the same time being modular and dynamic would also be "better". One human software engineer produces code differently from another, why? What is the optimal way to write an application? Is the optimal way a direct reflection of the k-complexity into the execution space and language of a particular OS and computer? No. It's not that simple. BUT an advanced intelligence would find more intelligent ways to represent thus. What I am saying here is that this "better" way would be more mathematically dense. Then that leads to the question of what do I mean by "mathematically dense"? In that "density" is where intelligence is represented or injected. It is not a maximum density, a k-complexity, but an efficient "density".. at the same time being modular and dynamic. BTW you don't have to buy into this as I am not proving anything here but I assume it is intuitively obvious to some. John ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
