My point was that the formula looks like Math but isn't.

 

My syntax isn't just another way of writing Math but a different way that
only looks something like Math.  My reasons for only using 3 levels of
precedence in a full condition has nothing to do with some higher order
axiom.  Like I already said, some programming languages have up to 20 levels
of precedence but I wanted to spare programmers having to remember them all.
Not Math, just plain old real world simplicity.

 

Math is based on axioms while the language I have created has other CS
concepts that are quite different.  I limit how long variable names can be
because I don't like typing all those characters.  To make sure I can reuse
the names of functions that I like, I made all function and variable names
relative to their Object Container or function.  Just plain old CS
practicality.

 

David Clark

 

From: Aaron Hosford [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: January-08-13 2:04 PM
To: AGI
Subject: Re: [agi] Why Logic & Maths Have Sweet FA to do with Real world
reasoning

 

But I could describe the way that expression is interpreted in strictly
mathematical terms. (Though I would hate to waste my time on such a useless
endeavor.) You've just described a different way of writing down the same
meaning. There is nothing intrinsically special about the way standard
mathematical notation is used. It was an accident of history. I could just
as well write it out in reverse polish notation.

 

y 5 2 + b * :=

 

This is still math, just a different dialect. We can invent new dialects all
day. This dynamic extensibility is one of the wonderful things about math as
opposed to ordinary language; if math in its current form doesn't do what I
need it to do, I can just expand it in the direction I need it to go. So
long as the end result is unambiguous and I've communicated how it works
effectively to others, I'm good. The integral sign is a classic example of
this process in use. It's just a fancy S (for "sum") made up to simplify the
expression of a complex construct for which the existing tools of the time
were inadequate. 




-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to