There is no way human conscious thought is algorithmic – algorithms don’t have
fundamental & continuous problems concentrating, algorithms don’t produce
disordered, distracted, excessive, deficient, repetitive, or continuously
deviating streams of thought. On the plus side human thought is endlessly
creative, and algos aren’t creative at all.
Are you prepared to dump algos and look for some other kind of programming?
No I thought you wouldn’t be prepared to do that. End of discussion?
From: Jim Bromer
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 6:48 PM
To: AGI
Subject: [agi] Steps of Thought Will Follow the Discovery of Forms-of-Thought
One of the problems I have had with the theories that are discussed in AI/AGI
discussions, is that they do not seem to answer the most basic of questions.
They never seem to be clearly related to the way we actually think. There are
explanations for this. First of all computer programming is not the same as
our personal experiences of thinking. This leads to some fracturing of the
principles of thought. Secondly, most of us have a sense that we have to
understand the underlying form-of-thought in order to understand how thought
might take place. And this is probably true.
Jim Bromer
AGI | Archives | Modify Your Subscription
-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
