The applications for holograms cellular automata in AGI? On Friday, February 27, 2015, Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > From: [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > To: [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > Subject: RE: [agi] Couple thoughts > > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 08:04:27 -0500 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Nanograte Knowledge Technologies via AGI [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] > > > > > > To me, the internet's issue would be issues of bandwidth and delay and > > > routing (latency) and so on, and off course availability and robustness > > and all > > > such stuff. Bad choice overall, in my view. Skype apparently uses the > > spare > > > resources on personal computers well, and probably other webapps too, > but > > > not for this level of computing. > > > > > > > Keep in mind "the internet" isn't only a collection of homogeneous nodes > > separated by high latency low bandwidth connections it's very > non-homogenous > > with many super low latency clusters of high performance computing > regions. > > Adaptive systems can also adapt to their computational resource > topologies. > > Software that can run on different substrates, or at least be ported, > > usually live longer lifetimes. > > > > But I won't try to sell on that I see you have a requirement for a GPU > > centric enabling parallelism. > > > > > Thank you John. The technology might change again. On has to > continuously sniff around for the best-fit solutions architecture. > > > > The "problem" I would like to address is how to connect a 3D printer to > > the > > > wormhole in our universe, via an adaptive, learning communication > service. > > > > > > > OK. That's either dreaming or very ambitious or both :) > > I think, the exponential, technology advances happening now is set to > continue. Every new step increases the viability of such a dream becoming > realized. I suppose, it is very ambitious, but I would not be surprised if > at least 30 other universities are working on a similar concept. As soon as > the super gene is uncovered - which I believe it would be - it would open > the door for the realization of this particular step in a a much, bigger > dream. > > I may not be a part of such pioneering work, but I could probably die > happy knowing that at least, I had one, original thought. Still on my quest > though. > > I sense I'm getting there, but how would one ever be able to verify such a > thing? Moot point. I'll even be okay learning that no original thought was > possible, which would support my theory of irrelevance. The journey would > be worth it. Worse-case scenario? It was helluva lotta fun! > > > > > > Fractals? Yes, the knowledge methodologies employed, to date, are > fractal > > > based, each component being a pure object, some recursive, others self > > > recursive. Each one represents as a system of systems on their own, and > > then > > > collectively at a quantum level. I have taken upon myself the job to > > integrate > > > these. It would seem to be my area of expertise. > > > > > > > I used to use pieces of Fractint code for various things back in the DOS > > days that was really the last time I've worked with fractals in depth. > How > > does the system you are thinking of work? Does it inject fractal to learn > > from complexity? Is it like fractal compression? > > Fractal compression could well be utilized at a holographic level, whether > logically, or as physical output. I don't know yet. Various applications > seem likely. > > For now, the core, integration methodology is rooted in fractal theory, > thus N scalability. All other schemata and/or supportive methodologies and > methods would have to conform to this requirement. In essence then, one > would not be amiss to say that the whole system enjoyed the benefit of a > symbiotic, fractal architecture. > > Randomness would be a key objective for research to resolve. If the system > cannot embrace true randomness, it would be quite useless. Thus, at the > logical-systems level, one has to consider any method, which would be > pattern-of-pattern friendly. Recently, I conducted an armchair experiment > to assess the reliability of a name-brand random generator, which claims to > use cosmic noise as random, input stream. Still, using a basic algorithm, I > discovered a few, consistent patterns in all the patterns that on-line > system generated, according to my specifications. > > I was thinking for some, bright mathematician to flow this algorithm over > a Markov chain, to see if we could not detect the "pattern of one", as a > symbol of effective complexity, which I have the notion might exist. I'll > keep that one aside for the team and an appropriate, research environment. > > > The conceptual movie already plays in my mind. But logically it's a > different story altogether. At some stage, I'm quite certain of it, I'll > fall off the edge, due to my own ignorance and inherent fallibility. > Further, my resources and effort has been considerable, so one can only > drive as far as one has fuel for. It's a highly-conservative approach then, > which is a good incentive for me not to waste any resources on wild-goose > chases. By then, my hope is we'd have a dedicated team working on this, > with unshakable funding in place, so my weaknesses would find support with > them and the organizational structure, and so on. > > To my reckoning, we have about 3 years left to conclude this work and have > a working prototype ready. I just think that the shit is going to hit the > fan after that, and the increased freedom to do research, almost at will, > would become severely impaired. So, dreamer, or not. Someone has to slog on > with it. > > Already, I noticed some benefit of that flowing into this community. It > was my pertinent choice to come share here, not coincidence. If we all did > that, we'd get there a lot sooner, or just in time. > > The magic continues... > > Rob > > > > > John > > > > > > > > AGI > > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > > RSS Feed: > https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26941503-0abb15dc > > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > *AGI* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now> > <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/26971539-9c060d2f> | > Modify > <https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;> > Your Subscription <http://www.listbox.com> > ------------------------------------------- AGI Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424 Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
