Steve - 
Keep your dream alive. No company owns the world forever. Not Google, not 
Apple. New gunslingers come to town all the time. 
Coutney

Sent from my iPhone


> On Oct 29, 2015, at 4:25 PM, Steve Richfield <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Mike,
> 
>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> The patent looks fine.  I wasn't trying to ridicule you.  I have grand
>> plans myself.  We all do.  We've all got delusions of grandeur on some
>> scale.  Otherwise we'd be better off with narrow AI.  I've tried to
>> quit what I am working on for something a bit more practical but I
>> always return.  I can't help myself.
> 
> What has been missing here is a flow of not-so-weak AI projects to bring in 
> money and hone our skills while we contemplate bigger things. As things now 
> stand, people here must choose between grunt programming jobs and 
> unemployment as they pursue their dreams, and I find this simply 
> UNACCEPTABLE. 
>> 
>> The statement of taking over the internet, though... I mean, google,
>> yes, has done that, but their market cap is waaaaaaaay up there.
> 
> There are three known lenses through which to view the knowledge of our 
> civilization:
> 1.  Searching: Google will probably always own this.
> 2.  Question answering: WolframAlpha seems to now own this, but Google has 
> started to put limited question recognition and answering into its interface. 
> 3.  Problem solving: THIS is what I seek to own - and have the patent(s) to 
> defend.
> 
> While each of these are the best solution for the needs they meet, problem 
> solving has a special thing going for it - it makes the perfect automated 
> salesman, whereas the other technologies can only throw advertisements at 
> people, and...
> 
> Whoever owns sales/advertising will own the Internet.
> 
> Of course when this becomes BIG enough, someone like Google will probably we 
> willing to throw enough money at it to purchase it, so in a sense you are 
> probably right that Google will probably prevail on the Internet, but only 
> after the people who built it have extracted some part of a billion dollars - 
> which will hopefully be enough to build even more interesting things.
> 
> Steve
> ======================= 
>> 
>> On 10/28/15, Steve Richfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Mike,
>> >
>> > Just read the patent:
>> >
>> > http://www.google.com/patents/US8788263
>> >
>> > and make up your own mind. There is much more that has been filed but has
>> > NOT yet been granted. I did NOT say that this is any sort of ultimate plan,
>> > just a LOT better than Google/Facebook/Yahoo/Amazon, etc., especially at
>> > identifying and approaching apparent potential customers (they call this
>> > "advertising" but I have a much better method) - which is where the money
>> > seems to be.
>> >
>> > I have a plan. Now I need people behind the various parts of it. With those
>> > people in place I can probably raise the money via EquityNet or something
>> > similar to make this real. With the money and the plan, we will all get
>> > paid and become rich and be able to work on REAL AGI and other interesting
>> > things.
>> >
>> > Steve
>> > ==========================
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Mike Archbold <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 10/28/15, Steve Richfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > Mike,
>> >> >
>> >> > Oh, I see, you are one of those AGI dualists - who think that computers
>> >> > can't do much until they are fully AGI, despite the "weak" AI
>> >> > approaches
>> >> > that are now making billions of dollars. If you think about it, with
>> >> > that
>> >> > attitude you are absolutely GUARANTEED not to be in on any big
>> >> revolutions,
>> >> > because you will sit out anything short of AGI, and lack relevant
>> >> > credentials if/when a true AGI opportunity arises.
>> >> >
>> >> > Jumping from counting clicks and tallying bags of words to actually
>> >> > understanding (initially, enough to identify which of hundreds of
>> >> > interesting meanings were conveyed) what has been said along with
>> >> > having
>> >> a
>> >> > good technical and financial plan to capitalize on this capability
>> >> > might
>> >> > not seem like much to an AGI dualist, but I am sticking with my 4-word
>> >> > description, unless of course you have a better ~4 word description of
>> >> > where this could eventually lead.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Huh?  You said you were planning to "take over the internet."  Wha?  I
>> >> have not read your posts in detail, although I've got some of the
>> >> picture of what you are doing.  I'm not of the opinion that full blown
>> >> human-level AGI is the single successful route.  How did you infer
>> >> that?  I'm just wondering if you were serious about "taking over the
>> >> internet."  That is patently grandiose claim, as any fair minded
>> >> person would tell you.  It sounds like the Evil Dr. Such-and-such in
>> >> an old Ian Fleming book, you know, he is on a desert island preparing
>> >> to take over the world.
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >> > Steve
>> >> > ===================
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Mike Archbold <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Don't you think "take over the internet" is a bit much?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 10/28/15, Steve Richfield <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I have been learning a LOT while looking for funding - which
>> >> >> > suggests
>> >> >> > we
>> >> >> > should all rethink our respective directions.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > The Jobs 2012 act made it possible to crowdfund projects not
>> >> >> > exceeding
>> >> >> $10M
>> >> >> > without going through the whole SEC public offering hassle. Then
>> >> >> > along
>> >> >> came
>> >> >> > sites like Kickstarter with their own visions for the future which
>> >> does
>> >> >> NOT
>> >> >> > include larger visions like those shared here. However, there are
>> >> >> > places
>> >> >> > like EquityNet in which larger ideas appear fundable, provided they
>> >> >> > don't
>> >> >> > bump up against $10M.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > When you look at ENTIRE projects including marketing, patent
>> >> >> > defense,
>> >> >> etc.,
>> >> >> > rather than just getting to a demo, $10M is really tight no matter
>> >> what
>> >> >> you
>> >> >> > are doing, especially if it involves any R&D. My own project to take
>> >> >> > over
>> >> >> > the Internet projected $10M when everything foreseeable was added
>> >> >> > in.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > So, I had an idea for an end-around where many of us here could get
>> >> >> > rich
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> > and be well paid as we get rich. Further, this will provide a
>> >> >> > stepping
>> >> >> > stone to even bigger things - maybe even an eventual AGI. Chop my
>> >> >> > project
>> >> >> > up into the separately marketable pieces needed to make the system
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> take
>> >> >> > over the Internet, and construct them in separately funded
>> >> corporations
>> >> >> > under a single umbrella. This way, each startup would be going into
>> >> >> > this
>> >> >> > with guaranteed customers, etc. The separate startups would include:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >    1. The core parsing and recognition technology
>> >> >> >    2. A smart web crawler that also gathers contact information,
>> >> >> > etc.
>> >> >> >    3. An idiom database with a few thousand common idioms and
>> >> >> > equivalent
>> >> >> >    straightforward text
>> >> >> >    4. A medical database ala DrEliza only greatly extended
>> >> >> >    5. An AI marketing organization
>> >> >> >    6. An Internet sales organization
>> >> >> >    7. etc.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Note that these pieces can be combined in various ways to make
>> >> >> > several
>> >> >> > strong products, e.g. NO ONE is going to write good code to
>> >> >> > understand
>> >> >> text
>> >> >> > without the idiom database - and nothing like it now exists.
>> >> >> > You can see the publicly-disclosed parts of the plan by reading the
>> >> >> patent
>> >> >> > at:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > http://www.google.com/patents/US8788263
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Also, there are other subsequent applications now in the "mill".
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > To make this work for you, we would work together to create a
>> >> >> crowdfundable
>> >> >> > entity that you would be in charge of, to actually get paid well to
>> >> >> > do
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> > work on the part of this project that you choose. These would be
>> >> >> presented
>> >> >> > together as a package, but each would also have a marketing plan to
>> >> >> survive
>> >> >> > and thrive outside of the package. This way, you would start with a
>> >> >> salary
>> >> >> > and customers waiting, rather than building something for nothing,
>> >> >> > in
>> >> >> > the
>> >> >> > hope that customers will come, and further, there would have patent
>> >> >> > protection for at least some parts of these projects.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Once you get your part up and running, you will have both money and
>> >> >> > credibility to build your own projects, rather than pieces of
>> >> something
>> >> >> > else.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Any interest in leading the charge to develop one of these pieces?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Steve
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -------------------------------------------
>> >> >> > AGI
>> >> >> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
>> >> >> > RSS Feed:
>> >> >> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae
>> >> >> > Modify Your Subscription:
>> >> >> > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>> >> >> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -------------------------------------------
>> >> >> AGI
>> >> >> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
>> >> >> RSS Feed:
>> >> >> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10443978-6f4c28ac
>> >> >> Modify Your Subscription:
>> >> >> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>> >> >> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a
>> >> six
>> >> > hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back
>> >> > full
>> >> > employment.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > -------------------------------------------
>> >> > AGI
>> >> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
>> >> > RSS Feed:
>> >> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae
>> >> > Modify Your Subscription:
>> >> > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>> >> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -------------------------------------------
>> >> AGI
>> >> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
>> >> RSS Feed:
>> >> https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10443978-6f4c28ac
>> >> Modify Your Subscription:
>> >> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>> >> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six
>> > hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full
>> > employment.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------
>> > AGI
>> > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
>> > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/11943661-d9279dae
>> > Modify Your Subscription:
>> > https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>> > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------
>> AGI
>> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
>> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/10443978-6f4c28ac
>> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Full employment can be had with the stoke of a pen. Simply institute a six 
> hour workday. That will easily create enough new jobs to bring back full 
> employment.
> 
> AGI | Archives  | Modify Your Subscription     



-------------------------------------------
AGI
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/21088071-f452e424
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=21088071&id_secret=21088071-58d57657
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to