|
Mike,
Actually, Stephen's method
*is* pretty much a correct way of doing exponential curve fitting. It
assumes that the underlying curve is an exponential rather than some kind of
hyperexponential, though. Kurzweil's contention is that a
hyperexponential (an exponential with a slowly exponentially growing
exponent) is a better fit
While Stephen's method
could be a slight underestimate due to its assumption of an exponential rather
than hyperexponential, I'm pretty certain your method leads to a gross
overestimate!! It seems pretty unlikely that the decrease of
entry level computer cost is gonna progress as fast as you say; that would mean
entry level computers were free in 2005.
Furthermore, even if entry
level computers DID become free in 2005, this would not cause tremendous
immediate AGI success! Although it would be cool, because we could get
effectively unlimited machines for development and testing
;-)
-- Ben
G
****
Based on
available data how are we to calculate the doubling time extrapolation into the
future? On 1/6/2003 Stephen Reed writes. "Progressing from -50 db HEC to 0
db HEC in 22 years is equivalent to Moore's Law doubling every 16 months. [
2^16.61 = 100025, 22/16.61*12 = 15.9 ]" A careful examination of this
formula shows that Stephen is merely averaging the doubling time over the past
22 years and applying that constant to the next 22 to arrive at his crossover
date of 2021. A constant extratulation of an average doubling time is
not the correct method to project an exponentially changing value.
Unfortunately I haven't been able to get good historical data on entry
level computer market. I would welcome any assistance. This is
my current extrapolation:
|
- [agi] "doubling time" revisted. Mike Deering
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revisted. Stephen Reed
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revisted. Ben Goertzel
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revisted. Brad Wyble
- RE: [agi] "doubling time" revisted... Ben Goertzel
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revi... Brad Wyble
- RE: [agi] "doubling time" ... Ben Goertzel
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" ... Mike Deering
- RE: [agi] "doubling time&q... Ben Goertzel
- RE: [agi] "doubling ti... Alexander E. Richter
- Re: [agi] "doubling time&q... Stephen Reed
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revisted... Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revi... Stephen Reed
