|
It is obvious that no one on this list agrees with
me. This does not mean that I am obviously wrong. The division is
very simple.
My position: the doubling time has been reducing and
will continue to do so.
Their position: the doubling time is
constant.
This is not a question of philosophy but only of the
data. What does the data show? If we had a stack of COMPUTER
SHOPPER magazines for the past twenty years the question could be decided
in short order. The drop in doubling time starts out very slowly.
That is why it is not obvious yet. By the time it becomes obvious it will
be too late.
Mike Deering.
www.SingularityActionGroup.com
<---new website.
|
- [agi] "doubling time" revisted. Mike Deering
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revisted. Stephen Reed
- RE: [agi] "doubling time" revisted. Ben Goertzel
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revisted. Brad Wyble
- RE: [agi] "doubling time" revisted... Ben Goertzel
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revi... Brad Wyble
- RE: [agi] "doubling time" ... Ben Goertzel
- RE: [agi] "doubling time" ... Mike Deering
- RE: [agi] "doubling time&q... Ben Goertzel
- RE: [agi] "doubling ti... Alexander E. Richter
- Re: [agi] "doubling time&q... Stephen Reed
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revisted... Eliezer S. Yudkowsky
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" revi... Stephen Reed
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" ... Brad Wyble
- RE: [agi] "doubling time&q... Ben Goertzel
- Re: [agi] "doubling time&q... Stephen Reed
- Re: [agi] "doubling time" ... Philip Sutton
- [agi] "doubling time"... Mike Deering
