Andrew, > If you cannot solve interesting computer science problems that are > likely to be simpler, then it is improbable that you'll ever be able > to solve really hard interesting problems like AGI (or worse, > Friendly AGI). I don't mean to disparage anyone doing AGI research, > but if they are incapable of solving the easy problems, why should > anyone expect them to solve the hard problems?
That's right to the point. That's why I think that AGI researcher should approximately follow this path: 1) Successfully deliver a software project (it doesn't need to have AI technologies at all). 2) Enhance software project with weak AI features or create weak AI project from scratch. 3) Enhance weak AI project to strong AI (AGI) project or create AGI project from scratch. ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=67457866-0ba041
