> > > > Could you describe a piece of technology that simultaneously: > - Is required for AGI. > - Cannot be required part of any useful narrow AI. >
The key to your statement is the word "required" Nearly any AGI component can be used within a narrow AI, but, the problem is, it's usually a bunch easier to make narrow AI's using components that don't have any AGI value... > > > Another way to go -- use existing narrow AIs as prototypes when > building AGI. > I don't really accept any narrow-AI as a prototype for an AGI. This is an example of what I meant when I said that what counts as a prototype is theory-dependent, I suppose... I think there is loads of evidence that narrow-AI prowess does not imply AGI prowess, so that a narrow-AI can't be considered a prototype for an AGI.. -- Ben G ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=67477308-6a7310
