Dennis,

> You need smarter programs.
> So why wouldn't you build such?

trying hard

> Start with weak AI programs. That would push technology envelope
> further and further and in the end AGI will be possible.

AGI is IMO possible now but requires very different approach than narrow AI.

> >> Any successful AGI prototype would attract investors anyway.
>
> > At this time, we still need investors spending money to develop prototypes.
>
> If developing prototype requires significant investments -- that means
> that technology is not ready yet for full scale AGI yet.

Technology IMO is. Dev/research time is expensive.

> Weak AI is a way to go at this moment.

true for some tasks

> >> > Many bright folks would IMO like to work on AGI full time but limited
> >> > resources force them to focus on other stuff.
> >>
> >> "Other stuff" is also important.
>
> > True, but more full time AGI folks wouldn't hurt.
>
> It would. "More full time AGI folks" means less full time folks on
> other important projects.

IMO worth it.

> > There are many hard problems to solve, including some which, if not
> > solved correctly in relatively near future, could cause the money
> > (made on those "better paying tasks") having only a fraction of its
> > current value. AGI could do so much for us that it would be IMO worth
> > to immediately stop working on all non-critical projects and
> > temporarily spend as many resources as possible on AGI R&D.
>
> What disastrous problems that cannot be solved without AGI are you
> referring to?

Problems that require hard-to-do evaluation of larger amounts of data
from different domains before important decision deadlines. We could
use narrow AI to do everything the AGI could do - except - we cannot
always do it fast enough - which costs lives and/or unnecessary
suffering you can see all around the world.

Regards,
Jiri Jelinek

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=67381162-3ea8d6

Reply via email to