> One of the things that I've been tempted to argue for a while is an entirely > alternate underlying software architecture for OpenCog -- people can then > develop in the architecture that is most convenient and then we could have > people cross-port between the two. I strongly contend that the current > architecture does not take advantage of a large part of the newest advances > and infrastructures of the past half-decade. I think that if people saw > what could be done with far less time and code utilizing already existing > functionality and better tools that C++ would be a dead issue.
Somehow I doubt that this list will be the place where the endless OS/language wars plaguing the IT community are finally solved ;-p Certainly there are plenty of folks with equal software engineering experience to you, advocating the Linux/C++ route (taken in the current OpenCog version) rather than the .Net/C# route that I believe you advocate... -- Ben G ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
