Terren: > I agree in spirit with your basic criticisms regarding current AI
and creativity. However, it must be pointed out that if you abandon
determinism, you find yourself in the world of dualism, or worse.
Nah. One word (though it would take too long here to explain) ;
nondeterministic programming.
Terren: you still need to have an explanation for how creativity emerges in
either case, but in contrast to what you said before, some AI folks have
indeed worked on this issue.
Oh, they've done loads of work, often fine work, i.e. produced impressive
but 'hack' variations on themes, musical, artistic, scripting etc. But the
people actually producing those "creative"/hack variations, will agree, when
pressed that they are not truly creative. And actual AGI-ers, to repeat,
AFAIK have not produced a single idea about how machines can be creative.
Not even a proposal, however wrong. Please point to one.
P.S. Glad to see your evolutionary perspective includes the natural kind - I
had begun to think, obviously wrongly, that it didn't.
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=111637683-c8fa51
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
