On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Abram Demski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben, > > No, I wasn't intending any weird chips. > > For me, the most important way in which you are a constructivist is > that you think AIXI is the ideal that finite intelligence should > approach. Hmmm... I'm not sure I think that. AIXI is ideal in terms of a certain formal definition of intelligence, which I don't necessarily accept as the end-all of intelligence... It may be that future science identifies conceptual shortcomings in the theoretical framework within which AIXI lives. But, I do think that AIXI is interesting as a source of inspiration for some aspects of the process of creating practical AGI systems. -- Ben G ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
