There are procedures in place for experimenting on humans. And the
biologies of people and animals are orthogonal! Much of this will be
simulated soon



On 11/17/08, Trent Waddington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I mean that people are free to decide if others feel pain. For example, a
>> scientist may decide that a mouse does not feel pain when it is stuck in
>> the eye with a needle (the standard way to draw blood) even though it
>> squirms just like a human would. It is surprisingly easy to modify one's
>> ethics to feel this way, as proven by the Milgram experiments and Nazi war
>> crime trials.
>
> I'm sure you're not meaning to suggest that scientists commonly
> rationalize in this way, nor that they are all Nazi war criminals for
> experimenting on animals.
>
> I feel the need to remind people that "animal rights" is a fringe
> movement that does not represent the views of the majority.  We
> experiment on animals because the benefits, to humans, are considered
> worthwhile.
>
> Trent
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> agi
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
> Modify Your Subscription:
> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=120640061-aded06
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to