Agree.

As far as a system is not pure deductive, it can be creative. What
usually called "creative thinking" often can be analyzed into a
combination induction, abduction, analogy, etc, as well as deduction.
When these inference are properly justified, they are rational.

To treat "creative" and "rational" as opposite to each other is indeed
based on a very narrow understanding of rationality and logic.

Pei

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 6:25 AM, Kaj Sotala <xue...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Mike Tintner <tint...@blueyonder.co.uk> 
> wrote:
>> Ben,
>>
>> I radically disagree. Human intelligence involves both creativity and
>> rationality, certainly.  But  rationality - and the rational systems  of
>> logic/maths and formal languages, [on which current AGI depends]  -  are
>> fundamentally *opposed* to creativity and the generation of new ideas.  What
>> I intend to demonstrate in a while is that just about everything that is bad
>> thinking from a rational POV is *good [or potentially good] thinking* from a
>> creative POV (and vice versa). To take a small example, logical fallacies
>> are indeed illogical and irrational - an example of rationally bad thinking.
>> But they are potentially good thinking from a creative POV -   useful
>> skills, for example, in a political spinmeister's art. (And you and Pei use
>> them a lot in arguing for your AGI's  :)    ).
>
> I think this example is more about needing to apply different kinds of
> reasoning rules in different domains, rather than the underlying
> reasoning process itself being different.
>
> In the domain of classical logic, if you encounter a contradiction,
> you'll want to apply a reasoning rule saying that your premises are
> inconsistent, and at least one of them needs to be eliminated or at
> least modified.
>
> In the domain of politics, if you encounter a contradiction, you'll
> want to apply a reasoning rule saying that this may come useful as a
> rhetorical argument. Note that even then, you need to apply
> rationality in order to figure out what kinds of contradictions are
> effective on your intended audience, and what kinds of contradictions
> you'll want to avoid. You can't just go around proclaiming "it is my
> birthday and it is not my birthday" and expect people to take you
> seriously.
>
> It seems to me like Mike is committing the fallacy of interpreting
> "rationality" in a too narrow way, thinking it to be something like a
> slightly expanded version of classical formal logic. That's a common
> mistake (oh, what damage Gene Roddenberry did to humanity when he
> created the character of Spock), but a mistake nonetheless.
>
> Furthermore, this currently seems to be mostly a debate over
> semantics, and the appropriate meaning of labels... if both Ben and
> Mike took the approach advocated in
> http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/02/taboo-words.html and taboo'd
> both "rationality" and "creativity", so that e.g.
>
> rationalityBen = [a process by which ideas are verified for internal
> consistency]
> creativityBen = [a process, currently not entirely understood, by
> which new ideas are generated]
> rationalityMike = [a set of techniques such as math and logic]
> creativityMike = well, not sure of what Mike's exact definition for
> creativity *would* be
>
> then, instead of sentences like "the wider culture has always known
> that rationality and creativity are  opposed" (to quote Mike's earlier
> mail), we'd get sentences like "the wider culture has always known
> that the set of techniques of math and logic are opposed to
> creativity", which would be much easier to debate. No need to keep
> guessing what, exactly, the other person *means* with "rationality"
> and "logic"...
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> agi
> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
> Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=123753653-47f84b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to