Indeed, public land is crucial to the system. In v4 I am thinking of
implementing a special clause that allows the Cartographor to
promulgate a list of Land Units (and accompanying facilities) that are
not changed by normal capture rules, can't be auctioned, and can only
be Public.

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Madeline <j...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> Alternatively, though starting everyone with a welcome package is probably a
> good idea, it seems clear the intention is to start by working on the public
> land (you don't need to have coins to build the facilities, and anyone can
> take from public land) and use the resources you get from there to branch
> out into private land (if you even want to, since you don't have to - and
> public land doesn't care about upkeep)
>
>
>
> On 2017-11-20 11:59, Madeline wrote:
>>
>> Maybe the plan is to make Corona and I the richest players :P (I don't
>> think I ever got to claim my welcome package?)
>> Or perhaps the intention is to give everyone a welcome package to start,
>> which is... really not spelled out.
>>
>>
>> On 2017-11-20 11:34, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I should add :)  The officer thing is a personal preference. But
>>> the circular coin thing - I'm just wearing my game designer hat
>>> and really failing to see how it will work, I feel like I'm either
>>> missing something (which is very very possible, I miss key lines
>>> all the time!) or it's broken...
>>>
>>> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Reuben Staley wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Title: Putting Agora on a Map v3
>>>>> Author: Trigon
>>>>> Co-Authors: Aris, ATMunn, G., o, VJ Rada
>>>>
>>>> Just to be clear; you're consciously getting rid of shinies, and
>>>> making it so you need Land to make Coins, but you need Coins to
>>>> buy land.  I'm really asking you to address this, I would greatly
>>>> appreciate it.  I'm trying to understand why this is not a circular
>>>> collapse like we've been going through already.
>>>>
>>>> If only to say "yes, it's really integral to my idea to ditch
>>>> shinies" (and how our currency supply is protected) that would
>>>> be great.
>>>>
>>>> I would also like to know what game benefit the officers enjoy
>>>> in this economy, because I'm not seeing it - missed something?
>>>> That one's really non-negotiable for me personally (even when I'm
>>>> not an officer).
>>>>
>>>> -G.
>>>
>>>
>>
>



-- 
Trigon

Reply via email to