What if the Arbitor just refused all CFJs? Or none of them?
On 12/10/2017 8:12 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 01:07 +0000, Alexis Hunt wrote:Another argument in favour of making CFJ calls less fundamentally conditional.Perhaps we should pragmatise CFJs? If you call them, they always go through unless explicitly refused by the Arbitor for not having payment. This would allow "public interest" CFJs to be called for free, too, so long as the Arbitor was on board.
