I have come across studies that have used local Moran's I and ones that have used global Moran's I but calculated using local windows. Each method can be used to create a map of Moran's I values to explore the pattern of spatial autocorrelation on the surface.
For exploratory purposes, is one better than the other? Thank you, Kevin -- * To post a message to the list, send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] * As a general service to the users, please remember to post a summary of any useful responses to your questions. * To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with no subject and "unsubscribe ai-geostats" followed by "end" on the next line in the message body. DO NOT SEND Subscribe/Unsubscribe requests to the list * Support to the list is provided at http://www.ai-geostats.org
