Conor MacNeill wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> And my other question would be, why introduce this to Gump? What is Gump
>> going to do with the new information? I can understand why you need it in
>> Centipede, but for Gump where's the value?
>
>
> Wouldn't a single project description that could be used by Gump, Maven,
> Centipede, whatever be a good thing?
IMO yes.
> Is that possible?
Yes.
Centipede uses Gump descriptor, but we found it was missing some infos
for the project, hence this version.
Gump needs no change to use it, since it skips unknown tags.
Since Gump will need some of this info, I thought I would share what we
have already done to enhance it.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
