[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/26/2002 05:17:58 PM:
...
>>Centipede uses Gump descriptor, but we found it was missing some infos
>>for the project, hence this version.
>>
>>Gump needs no change to use it, since it skips unknown tags.
>
> Ok, so why mix up things like the repository descriptor and the project
> descriptor? Why not place your repository information in that descriptor?
Good point. However the project has info on the default repository.
Gump can be used also on copies, and can override that value.
> It seems Gump only supports CVS, and that you are continuing that. In
> Maven, we are open to the possibility of other VCS's.
Good point 2.
We should change cvs to vcs, and have an attribute on the type of
repository.
>>Since Gump will need some of this info, I thought I would share what we
>>have already done to enhance it.
>
> And please keep it up. Don't let my pedantic ways get to you. If Gump will
> need it, can you explain where? Is there an extension to Gump for
> publishing project info, rather than building and publishing results, I'm
> not aware of?
Gump publishes results of the runs.
This info would be provided as part of that publishing, and only in that
context, as is done now.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
