[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 >
> Maybe, maybe not. There are multiple descriptors with Gump: Workspace,
> Module, Project, Profile, Repository...
> 
> And the new proposal has cvs stuff at the module level for example.

The old one as well.
I guess you never really read the current Gump descriptor format anyway.

> Some of the element names are nicely ambiguous: a module 'url' for example,
> and the <what>, and <why> elements at the module rather than project level
> as well.

This is wanted.
The unit is the module.

Projects are in fact main build targets.

I think it would be nice maybe to change project in something more near 
to what that tag is really used for.

> Along with that, Maven explicitly stays away from mentioning ant in it's
> descriptor as well. So there are several disconnects.

Maven?
We are talking about Gump.
Gump has an ant tag.

Before annoying me with stupid assertions, RTFM.

-- 
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
             - verba volant, scripta manent -
    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to