Nicola Ken Barozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/26/2002 05:17:58 PM:
>
> Conor MacNeill wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> And my other question would be, why introduce this to Gump? What is
Gump
> >> going to do with the new information? I can understand why you need it
in
> >> Centipede, but for Gump where's the value?
> >
> >
> > Wouldn't a single project description that could be used by Gump,
Maven,
> > Centipede, whatever be a good thing?
>
> IMO yes.
>
> > Is that possible?
>
> Yes.
>
> Centipede uses Gump descriptor, but we found it was missing some infos
> for the project, hence this version.
>
> Gump needs no change to use it, since it skips unknown tags.
Ok, so why mix up things like the repository descriptor and the project
descriptor? Why not place your repository information in that descriptor?
It seems Gump only supports CVS, and that you are continuing that. In
Maven, we are open to the possibility of other VCS's.
> Since Gump will need some of this info, I thought I would share what we
> have already done to enhance it.
And please keep it up. Don't let my pedantic ways get to you. If Gump will
need it, can you explain where? Is there an extension to Gump for
publishing project info, rather than building and publishing results, I'm
not aware of?
> --
> Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - verba volant, scripta manent -
> (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work: http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
