Personally i think that we should remove the feature: color text depends on
the user's state.
About the buddy icons we should use colored icons... i don't care if they
are wlm2009-like or not.

*Square87*

2009/3/27 Gustavo A. Díaz <gustavo.d...@gmail.com>

> I've read about the nicknames, but i thought you referred to buddy icons
> too was well.
>
> 2009/3/27 Youness Alaoui <kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net>
>
> No, I wasn't talking about the buddy icons, I was talking about the color
>> of the nicknames! Just the fact that the text gets colored depending on the
>> state! That's why I said black :p  Yes the images should have less
>> saturation, but the text also should be more subtle...
>>
>> Also, WLM doesn't  color the nicknames depending on the state. It actually
>> either shows a little square to represent the buddy (with green/available,
>> red/busy, orange/away or gray/offline) or it shows a thick frame around the
>> DP if you show the DP in the CL.
>>
>>
>> 2009/3/27 Gustavo A. Díaz <gustavo.d...@gmail.com>
>>
>> To 4#
>>>
>>> Yes, images has a little bit more of Saturation... agree that should have
>>> less.
>>> When deleted the box images speeds up way faster the skin, is why i did.
>>> About the state colors of the buddies, is like latest WLM does, and i
>>> think is pretty more simple than adding an extra icon next to the buddy to
>>> represent it (and since small images are hardly to represent in a clear
>>> way). So, that won't change.
>>> If i add more black colors in the skin, i should change many others
>>> images. So, i don't know.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> 2009/3/26 Youness Alaoui <kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net>
>>>
>>>> Ok, well my opinion is this :
>>>>
>>>> 1 - Ship only one skin.. adding more skins will just make our download
>>>> file bigger, no need for that when users don't care.
>>>>
>>>> 2 - I don't like the minimal skin, I tried it, and it's dead ugly, I do
>>>> not believe that it represents aMSN properly! It is also a "skin based on
>>>> pidgin", but we are aMSN, we have our own identity and I do not beleive 
>>>> that
>>>> we should have a default skin that is a copy of another software!
>>>>
>>>> 3 - The attractiveness in the minimal skin is that it's fast and small
>>>> memory footprint (I guess)... but we only chose it as the 'fast skin'
>>>> because of  its name!!! It's called minimal, so we think it's the best we
>>>> can get.. that's wrong. I believe that we should instead make our default
>>>> skin use less cpu/memory! The CPU is mostly taken for constantly resizing
>>>> the images in the background box of the groups in the CL, and in the chat
>>>> window's top bar, etc.. we should make a skin that do not use these 
>>>> features
>>>> and that's all we need!
>>>>
>>>> 4 - The screenshot of the newest saphire that vivia posted looks nice!
>>>> no more box, which makes it quite nice and probably speeds up the CPU 
>>>> usage,
>>>> however, I think the orange/green are way too flashy and they hurt the
>>>> eyes.. I think the colors should have a lower tone... also, most users 
>>>> don't
>>>> like the colors per status thingy, so we should maybe try to make it pretty
>>>> much black with just small variations... I don't know if you understand 
>>>> what
>>>> I mean...
>>>>
>>>> 5 - maemo will have its own .deb, so if you think a skin fits better for
>>>> that platform, then make that skin the default! Same applies for anything
>>>> else, ubuntu could use the 'human' skin as default, etc.. anyone is free to
>>>> have specialized skins per arch/distro.. but the official default one 
>>>> should
>>>> be something that we all like and that is universal and that we think
>>>> represents aMSN clearly, and I believe the current Saphire is close to 
>>>> doing
>>>> that!
>>>>
>>>> 6 - Taken from here :
>>>> http://www.amsn-project.net/forums/viewtopic.php?p=37140#37140
>>>>
>>>> a few suggestions on what a user thinks about the current default (his
>>>> views might not be everyone's views, but still interesting to consider) :
>>>>
>>>> [quote]
>>>>
>>>> 1- In the contact list, no boxes and plain white background would be
>>>> better.
>>>> 2- Top part shouldn't be white to differentiate it from the contact
>>>> list.
>>>> 3- Contacts take up too much space (make images smaller.)
>>>> 4- No colored nicknames based on status (or make it optional).
>>>> 5- Blue icons with shadows and simple gray layout don't go together, so
>>>> either everything blue with shadows (like Windows Live Messenger) or
>>>> everything simple (like the skin you mentioned).
>>>> 6- Icons in chat window are too big and space between the text areas is
>>>> too wide.
>>>> 7- Messages in the chat window should begin a bit to the right (relative
>>>> to 'Contact says:').
>>>> [/quote]
>>>>
>>>> I think about his comments that :
>>>>
>>>> - 1, 2, 6 are valid..
>>>>
>>>> - 3 and 4, more or less : the CL images are a good size, but maybe just
>>>> a liiiiiitle bit smaller would be better and, the coloring should be very
>>>> subtle rather than very flashy
>>>>
>>>> - 5 I don't understand that stuff
>>>>
>>>> - 7 is unrelated to skin...
>>>>
>>>> That's my 0.03 CAD
>>>>
>>>> KaKaRoTo
>>>>
>>>> 2009/3/26 Mirko Hansen <baaa...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> Minimal skin as default skin? Well, I don't know if that's a good idea.
>>>>> There are many people that rate software after their first look, so if 
>>>>> they
>>>>> see our great screenshots on the homepage, download it and then "only" see
>>>>> aMSN with the minimal skin, it's not the best first impression. Sure they
>>>>> can change the skin, but I there are so many people that kick away 
>>>>> software
>>>>> that doesn't fit their imaginations from the beginning. So I think we 
>>>>> should
>>>>> let Sapphire be the default skin if possible. Maybe we could decide
>>>>> depending on the OS which skin is the default:
>>>>> Memo, Windows < XP, and maybe other OSs that are run on systems with
>>>>> lower resources for sure = minmal
>>>>> others = Sapphire
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/3/26 Vivia Nikolaidou <vi...@ee.auth.gr>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009, Boris "billiob" Faure wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > I fully agree : minimal by default + ship Sapphire.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK - which version of Sapphire? IIRC this is the most recent
>>>>>> screenshot of
>>>>>> the most recent version:
>>>>>> http://amsn.lnxteam.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/sapphire25-alt.png
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should we make a forum poll?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > About the aWLM2009 skin, we may not be able to ship it due to
>>>>>> licensing
>>>>>> > issues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IIRC there are no licensing issues as long as you redesign every icon
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> scratch instead of copying it - you can even GPL it. :) I'm not sure
>>>>>> though, can anyone tell me for sure?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > BTW, we should ask the author of the minimal skin to complete it a
>>>>>> > little bit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes - and if he can't, we should complete it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vivia
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Amsn-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Amsn-devel mailing list
>>>>> Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Amsn-devel mailing list
>>>> Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gustavo A. Díaz
>>> GDNet Projects
>>> www.gdnet.com.ar
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Amsn-devel mailing list
>>> Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amsn-devel mailing list
>> Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gustavo A. Díaz
> GDNet Projects
> www.gdnet.com.ar
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amsn-devel mailing list
> Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Amsn-devel mailing list
Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel

Reply via email to