Yes, and if the number was 28, I'd be the first to write 22 simple
applications this afternoon to win the remaining slots :-)

But I think it is a waste of time, and therefore concentrate on
polishing the existing application :-)

Peli

On Apr 9, 12:10 pm, Muthu Ramadoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If exactly 50 submissions are made, and google awards 50 winners, its
> time to believe we are living in a perfect world. :)
>
>
>
> Philip wrote:
> > Peli,
>
> > Though your reasoning makes sense, I believe the numbers mentioned in
> > the Judging process summary MAY have more to do with the mere human
> > nature since they are put together by people (did anybody say
> > androids?). Humans love nice round numbers (see this for more details
> >http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=why-things-cost-1995). Of course
> > you would not expect them to say something like "we will select 76 or
> > 64 or 123 submissions". 100 sounds nice, it's twice the number of the
> > first round winners so why not...
>
> > Philip
>
> > On Apr 9, 12:45 pm, Peli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Incognito,
>
> >> I'm really sorry that I have to scatter your hopes for few
> >> submissions. Dan Morrill has the most accurate submission count tool,
> >> but he will not share his information. But luckily some information
> >> leaked :-)
>
> >> Look at the page "The Android Developer Challenge Judging 
> >> Process":http://code.google.com/android/adc_judging.html
>
> >> This page was added recently, and whoever wrote this knew the number
> >> of submissions up to that point and could estimate the expected total
> >> number of submissions. It states that phase I will select 100
> >> submissions with the highest scores. This pre-selection would not make
> >> any sense if there were less than 100 submissions to be expected, and
> >> also would not be necessary if the number of submissions was only
> >> around 150. Note that phase I already follows a "threshold" phase
> >> where all submissions that do not run are dropped.
>
> >> The distinction between phase I and phase II (which is nowhere
> >> mentioned in the ADC terms and conditions) is a move that is only
> >> necessary if there are at least a few hundred applications expected
> >> that pass the initial threshold.
>
> >> It would be very interesting to know the true statistics once the
> >> competition is over :-)
>
> >> Peli
>
> >> On Apr 9, 8:34 am, Incognito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> OK, I know that this is extremely unlikely. But can you imagine that
> >>> around 50 entries were submitted? Yes, 300 now sounds far fetched. It
> >>> will probably be around 150 apps or less based on the turnout that
> >>> I've seen here. I'm assuming that there are a lot of small
> >>> applications from users that do not check this forum.
>
> --
> Thanks.
>
> Muthu 
> Ramadosshttp://mobeegal.inhttp://androidrocks.inhttp://intellibitz.comhttp://twitter.com/intellibitzhttp://linkedin.com/in/tellibitzhttp://slideshare.net/intellibitzhttp://groups.google.com/group/android-chennai
> +91 44 22476750
>
> We develop innovative search solutions using LBS for Android.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Challenge" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to