> Unless the ADC II is significantly improved, our developers will think > twice if it worths the efforts.
yeah, at this time, word of Google and their "rules", is a piece of shit. > At least, the judges, their > qualifications, and the judging process should be published before the > challenge starts.The reason there are a lot complains is because the > community has had good faith in Google and has believed in its "Do no > evil" slogan. Most developers went into to the challenge without > knowing exactly who, how and when their months of efforts would be > judged. and that was our mistake. One good lesson more. Do not trust corporations. They give us hope, and no clear rules. It was not fair. And then we see some "experts" doing "proffessional" 1 minute judging our 5 months work.. LOL. This was lame. > How many time the developers have to "beg" to know more? How > many time the information finally coming in contain some kind of > mistakes/confusions? I think, they have no good will and their "mistakes" have some reason. greets, peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Challenge" group. To post to this group, send email to android-challenge@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-challenge?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
