>
> 2. Charging a *small* fee per app would actually work, without unduly
> hurting most legitimate devs. Maybe $5 or $10 per app; if your app
> isn't worth $10 to you to list, how serious can you be? OTOH, even
> such a small fee would stop the spam dead in its tracks. There might
> be a few legitimate edge cases which would be adversely affected, but
> it's worth considering nonetheless.

This could be a good solution, at least it would keep a few spammers
out and I would not mind at all to pay such a small fee to publish my
app even if I do it for free.

>
> 3. Improving the discoverability of quality apps on the Market, and
> letting the crap fall to the bottom. This seems like the best
> solution, if it's done well - but so far, Google has shown itself to
> be either unwilling or unable to do this.

I like this a lot. Appbrain does this in their version of the market
(which I honestly use more than the Android one). They have pretty
well managed to filter out spammers and bring up some good apps that
would not be easily discovered.

http://blog.appbrain.com/2010/03/appbrain-launches-automatic-filtering.html

Surely Google could come up with a even better system, right?

Alberto

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Android Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en

Reply via email to