You know, as a potential buyer of apps, a 24 hour return period seems pretty reasonable, even a little short, to me. Maybe if your app can't hold the customer's attention for that long, its not worth paying for in the first place...
On Feb 22, 6:12 pm, JP <joachim.pfeif...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 22, 1:23 pm, Java Developer <supp...@cyntacks.com> wrote: > > > Al, > > > We finally made the decision to pull the plug too. > > I wonder how pro's that build things from scratch (i.e. do not > leverage existing back ends such as Weather Channel, Amazon etc.) > would sign up to the platform in an effort to build innovative apps. > Technically, Android has the capabilities and "best in class" up front > effort and cost. > > It can be frustrating at times, to say the least. I backed off quite a > bit ever since the Google team wasn't able or willing to disperse the > allegations that the ADC1 was extended to allow the MIT team to submit > and take a price. I sure did not consider quitting my day job. > Learning about pretty significant issues like the sidetracked SDK > releases in the ADC1 or the launch of paid apps through off-hand > remarks in the WSJ is <you fill the blank>. > Poor relationship building. > > ** Google I/O coming. Opportunity to fix the relationship with the > developer community ** --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to android-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to android-developers-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
