What a great thread. I am interested in finding out more about the free cranberrys
On Oct 19, 5:29 pm, AdroitAndroid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Al, please accept my congratulations on your ability to use WhoIs and > Google, and my condolences on the loss of your sense of propriety. As > I said before, I'm happy to discuss my background with anyone who > expresses interest in the idea. I never expected to have total > anonymity - although I do know ways to achieve that, were I certain > that it was warranted. I simply wasn't sure I wanted to advertise my > involvement to the whole world as it might cause my clients to worry > that I would be distracted from their projects. Thank you for making > that decision for me - you clearly know better than I do what's best > for my business. > > I don't know how I have "hit" your "button"... II have done nothing to > attack you and have only defended my idea... a simple idea to try to > make things better for the individual Android developer. I admit that > the $200 application fee was a mistake... but that's the only thing I > think I've done wrong here, and yet you feel it necessary to publicly > examine and pass judgment on my life. > > The funny thing is that you state: "There are over 2,000 members of > the android-discuss list and over 10,000 on android-developers, access > to all these people is free, you can team up with any number of them > as you want, negotiate profit and work sharing agreements on a per- > project basis, and choose the distribution methods you wish to use." > This is really all I'm trying to do. I just put some structure around > it and proposed it in an open forum. > > I'm done discussing this with you, Mr. Sutton. Please don't respond > to this. > > If anyone else is interested in discussing it further, please let me > know. > > On Oct 19, 9:54 am, JP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Oct 19, 8:50 am, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> JP, > > > > I don't think he's as innocent as he's making out. > > > > Firstly he claims that going public would risk his day job. The guy > > > works for himself at the company he founded, so how, exactly, could that > > > be true? > > > I really question his judgment to take such a risk - he's got a really > > good day job. > > > > Finally, He's got my back up. I'll happily admit it. I get peeved at > > > people who try to pull stunts like this and this guy has hit my button > > > and pushed it further than it should be pushed, so I decided to call him > > > out. I wanted to stop his "secret side-job society of top developers > > > with a 200 dollar joining fee" nonsense which may sound appealing to > > > some people, and make him stand up and be counted. > > > > So yes, maybe it was unprofessional, and yes, it may have been a little > > > unnesserary, but hopefully it will also kill off the idea you can post > > > here asking people for money with shady ideas and expect to remain > > > unknown. > > > Well I guess we're all better off to put this to rest now. > > > Funny, I've been down at Laguna Seca yesterday and the whole NSX crowd > > was there. Should've cracked up a chat about that guy from Georgia > > they pwned last Christmas holidays. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
