And its friday, so pretty motivated to rant ;)

take care,
Muthu Ramadoss.

http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz +91-9840348914
http://androidrocks.in - Android Consulting.



2009/2/27 Al Sutton <[email protected]>

>
> If it gets a rant out of you then I know it's a serious problem :).
>
> Al.
>
> Muthu Ramadoss wrote:
> > Oh yeah, 256 to 512MB upgrade?&#!
> >
> > The first thing after getting my ADP1 was to change my 1GB sdcard to a
> > 4GB one. I would have swapped it for 16GB if it was available here. I
> > guess this is what most users do. Why do they do it? They do it so
> > they can store more of their stuff on sdcard. Not just music and
> > videos. We want the apps there. We want the data there. We want
> > whatever junk we can put in there. To be honest my sdcard is lying
> > idle. But you know what, a lot of apps got uninstalled already because
> > the device ran out of storage space trying to test our new app. And
> > this made me think about the idle sdcard. The untouched tiny little
> > sdcard. I could've used the sdcard.. if only Android.. you know I
> > coulda.. [breaks into uncontrollable sobs]
> >
> > [regains composure]
> >
> > hmm hmm..
> >
> > Hope Android team is aware of this limitation, and are seriously
> > considering this as an high priority issue and fix it fast to make
> > their end users happy.
> >
> > [hits the pub indefinitely along with his brand new sdcard buddy]
> >
> > take care,
> > Muthu Ramadoss.
> >
> > http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz +91-9840348914
> > http://androidrocks.in - Android Consulting.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2009/2/27 Al Sutton <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >
> >
> >     I think the latest effort to help with that problem is having
> >     double the
> >     internal flash on the HTC-Magic over the G1, but as we all know
> >     limiting
> >     storage on a device is never a good idea as someone will always
> >     fill it :).
> >
> >     Al.
> >
> >     Muthu Ramadoss wrote:
> >     > All valid points.
> >     >
> >     > The biggest oversight is that of the internal memory. I don't
> really
> >     > understand the point of "Paid Android Market" when you don't
> >     have any
> >     > place to put those apps in.
> >     >
> >     > People were concerned about paid apps sales number sometime back. I
> >     > mean with this big gaping hole, how can any apps sell? Ed raised
> >     valid
> >     > points in another thread when he said users are constantly
> >     > uninstalling apps to fit it some other app in its place.
> >     >
> >     > Right now G1 is for GMail, and Pacman. Nothing else.
> >     >
> >     > take care,
> >     > Muthu Ramadoss.
> >     >
> >     > http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz +91-9840348914
> >     > http://androidrocks.in - Android Consulting.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > 2009/2/27 Al Sutton <[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>>
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     I'm not really feeling pitty for then as a lot of the problems
> >     >     have been
> >     >     brought about by a bad development and release process.
> >     >
> >     >     - Someone, somewhere signed off on a design which had
> >     limited internal
> >     >     memory and no ability to install apps outside of the
> >     internal memory.
> >     >     Did this person or group not think that users would ever want
> to
> >     >     install
> >     >     10+ apps?
> >     >     - Did no-one think about supporting the ADP1 when a 1.1
> firmware
> >     >     codebase was handed over to T-Mobile?, or did someone just
> >     not think
> >     >     about rolling new firmware for ADP1s when Google started
> >     selling them?
> >     >     - Someone signed off on taking live the paid-apps
> >     implementation, did
> >     >     they not think about the problems it would create for the
> >     existing
> >     >     owners of ADP1s?
> >     >
> >     >     To me it just seems that the mentality is that of a development
> >     >     shop run
> >     >     wild.
> >     >
> >     >     One of the most of the successful projects I've worked on
> >     had a QA
> >     >     manager who would organise peer reviews, look for
> >     inconsistencies in
> >     >     approaches to problems and put developers together to see which
> >     >     approach
> >     >     offered the best benefits, but they would never claim they
> >     knew which
> >     >     approach was "best" because they didn't write code for the
> >     product
> >     >     (about the only things he would challenge developers on was
> >     spelling
> >     >     mistakes and basic coding errors, apart from that he'd just
> >     >     arrange for
> >     >     two or more developers to highlight problems and work out
> >     solutions).
> >     >     This would have thrashed algorithmic problems such as
> >     copy-protection
> >     >     being easily circumventable and having the debug flag left
> >     on which
> >     >     allowed the "type reboot to reboot" problem.
> >     >
> >     >     After the QA manager rubber stamped a release it would then
> >     go to a
> >     >     release manager whose sole job was to look at the big picture.
> >     >     He'd say
> >     >     to developers things like "How does this affect the version
> >     we have
> >     >     running at customer X's site?", or "Is this release really
> >     of value to
> >     >     our customers or are we making it because a developer has
> >     come up with
> >     >     something cool that they want to show off?", and maintained
> >     a list of
> >     >     issues and considerations for the various deployments. This
> >     is where
> >     >     things like not allowing developers to see comments on their
> >     own apps,
> >     >     not allowing developers to list prices in other currencies,
> >     and not
> >     >     being able to create a firmware release for the ADP1 would have
> >     >     arisen.
> >     >
> >     >     To me it seems that these two jobs are either missing from
> >     the Android
> >     >     process or not being done very well.
> >     >
> >     >     Al.
> >     >
> >     >     Muthu Ramadoss wrote:
> >     >     > I can only feel pity for the poor Googs. Man, my head is
> >     >     spinning with
> >     >     > the number of must fix issues going rounds already.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > Increasing internal memory
> >     >     > SDcard applications support
> >     >     > ADP1 updates
> >     >     > ADP1 paid app support
> >     >     > Providing Google binaries
> >     >     >
> >     >     > and on and on and on
> >     >     > ...
> >     >     >
> >     >     > take care,
> >     >     > Muthu Ramadoss.
> >     >     >
> >     >     > http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz +91-9840348914
> >     >     > http://androidrocks.in - Android Consulting.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     > 2009/2/27 vendor.net <http://vendor.net>
> >     <http://vendor.net> <http://vendor.net>
> >     >     <vendor.net <http://vendor.net> <http://vendor.net>
> >     >     > <http://vendor.net>@gmail.com <http://gmail.com>
> >     <http://gmail.com> <http://gmail.com>>
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     Don`t be so sure. There is no official statement about
> >     that.
> >     >     I`ve
> >     >     >     asked google (JBQ as a representative) if there will
> >     be paid
> >     >     apps and
> >     >     >     copy protected apps in ADP 1, but he didn`t answer me
> with
> >     >     positive
> >     >     >     maybe because they don`t know or don`t want to tell us
> >     their
> >     >     plans...
> >     >     >     The whole concept of Android and the first android
> >     phone and
> >     >     ADP1 was
> >     >     >     great till I found that we were kicked out of the paid
> >     apps.
> >     >     This
> >     >     >     issue should be (I think - must be) resolved and ADP 1
> >     >     should support
> >     >     >     installing paid apps.
> >     >     >
> >     >     >     On 25 Фев, 04:58, Muthu Ramadoss
> >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     >     <mailto:[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     >     >     <mailto:[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     >     <mailto:[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
> >     >     >     > Yes, paid markets will be visible only after ADP
> >     updates that
> >     >     >     google will
> >     >     >     > hopefully provide soon.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > take care,
> >     >     >     > Muthu Ramadoss.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >
> >
> http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz+91-9840348914http://androidrocks.in-
> >     >     >     Android Consulting.
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Troglodad
> >     >     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >     >     >     <mailto:[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
> >     >     wrote:
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > > Sorry for the noob question, but do I understand
> >     that we
> >     >     can't
> >     >     >     access
> >     >     >     > > paid apps on the Dev1 until we get it updated? And
> >     that
> >     >     >     whether we get
> >     >     >     > > an update is up in the air?
> >     >     >     >
> >     >     >     > > (I got my Dev1 in hopes of havign the time to
> >     learn the code
> >     >     >     and start
> >     >     >     > > making apps, but work and life are conspiring
> >     against me and
> >     >     >     devouring
> >     >     >     > > all my free time)
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     >
> >     >     > >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >     --
> >     >
> >     >     * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/*
> >     >
> >     >     ======
> >     >     Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> >     >     company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp
> >     House,
> >     >     152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
> >     >
> >     >     The views expressed in this email are those of the author
> >     and not
> >     >     necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates,
> >     or it's
> >     >     subsidiaries.
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >     > >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >
> >     * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *
> >
> >     ======
> >     Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> >     company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> >     152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
> >
> >     The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> >     necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> >     subsidiaries.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
>
>
> --
>
> * Written an Android App? - List it at http://andappstore.com/ *
>
> ======
> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
>
> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> subsidiaries.
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to