I do nightly builds (well.. when there are changes) that can be flashed with
"fastboot flash {partition} {partition.img}" (system, userdata, boot) at
http://andblogs.net/images/snapshots

There is no official way back, but I also have update.zip and fastboot
versions of the stock images on my site (backed up off JF's adp1 way back
when they first started arriving).

2009/2/27 JustAnotherDe <[email protected]>

>
> Would Google have excluded any source from the tree that's available?
>
> How difficult might it be to build a version and flash it to the dev1?
> I've built the code - pulled in the "extra proprietary" files from the
> vendors directory. All I've got to do now is actually flash the phone
> - I'm just a bit scared. I don't know too much about it and don't want
> to have to spend days going through forums and sites to figure out how
> to get my phone back if I brick it.
>
> Anyone willing (daring enough?) to test out my build is welcome to get
> in touch with me for a copy...
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2:40 pm, Al Sutton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'd wait for firm release dates before saying there will be dozens of
> > 'phones. Most (if not all) of the devices could run Symbian, Win Mobile,
> > etc., and until they're formally announced, all the licensing agreements
> > are in place, and have shipping dates I wouldn't bank on them being
> > Android 'phones.
> >
> > Al.
> >
> >
> >
> > Christine wrote:
> > > On Feb 27, 8:39 am, Muthu Ramadoss <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >> Right now G1 is for GMail, and Pacman. Nothing else.
> >
> > > wow...
> >
> > > Right now, there's G1s. In April, there will be G2s. At the end of
> > > this year, there will be dozens of phones, all different. Some you
> > > will like, others you won't. By the time the phones get more mature,
> > > we'll all have the knowledge and experience to develop great apps.
> >
> > > So what's your point?
> >
> > > Christine
> >
> > >> take care,
> > >> Muthu Ramadoss.
> >
> > >>
> http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz+91-9840348914http://androidrocks.in-AndroidConsulting.
> >
> > >> 2009/2/27 Al Sutton <[email protected]>
> >
> > >>> I'm not really feeling pitty for then as a lot of the problems have
> been
> > >>> brought about by a bad development and release process.
> >
> > >>> - Someone, somewhere signed off on a design which had limited
> internal
> > >>> memory and no ability to install apps outside of the internal memory.
> > >>> Did this person or group not think that users would ever want to
> install
> > >>> 10+ apps?
> > >>> - Did no-one think about supporting the ADP1 when a 1.1 firmware
> > >>> codebase was handed over to T-Mobile?, or did someone just not think
> > >>> about rolling new firmware for ADP1s when Google started selling
> them?
> > >>> - Someone signed off on taking live the paid-apps implementation, did
> > >>> they not think about the problems it would create for the existing
> > >>> owners of ADP1s?
> >
> > >>> To me it just seems that the mentality is that of a development shop
> run
> > >>> wild.
> >
> > >>> One of the most of the successful projects I've worked on had a QA
> > >>> manager who would organise peer reviews, look for inconsistencies in
> > >>> approaches to problems and put developers together to see which
> approach
> > >>> offered the best benefits, but they would never claim they knew which
> > >>> approach was "best" because they didn't write code for the product
> > >>> (about the only things he would challenge developers on was spelling
> > >>> mistakes and basic coding errors, apart from that he'd just arrange
> for
> > >>> two or more developers to highlight problems and work out solutions).
> > >>> This would have thrashed algorithmic problems such as copy-protection
> > >>> being easily circumventable and having the debug flag left on which
> > >>> allowed the "type reboot to reboot" problem.
> >
> > >>> After the QA manager rubber stamped a release it would then go to a
> > >>> release manager whose sole job was to look at the big picture. He'd
> say
> > >>> to developers things like "How does this affect the version we have
> > >>> running at customer X's site?", or "Is this release really of value
> to
> > >>> our customers or are we making it because a developer has come up
> with
> > >>> something cool that they want to show off?", and maintained a list of
> > >>> issues and considerations for the various deployments. This is where
> > >>> things like not allowing developers to see comments on their own
> apps,
> > >>> not allowing developers to list prices in other currencies, and not
> > >>> being able to create a firmware release for the ADP1 would have
> arisen.
> >
> > >>> To me it seems that these two jobs are either missing from the
> Android
> > >>> process or not being done very well.
> >
> > >>> Al.
> >
> > >>> Muthu Ramadoss wrote:
> >
> > >>>> I can only feel pity for the poor Googs. Man, my head is spinning
> with
> > >>>> the number of must fix issues going rounds already.
> >
> > >>>> Increasing internal memory
> > >>>> SDcard applications support
> > >>>> ADP1 updates
> > >>>> ADP1 paid app support
> > >>>> Providing Google binaries
> >
> > >>>> and on and on and on
> > >>>> ...
> >
> > >>>> take care,
> > >>>> Muthu Ramadoss.
> >
> > >>>>http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz+91-9840348914
> > >>>>http://androidrocks.in-Android Consulting.
> >
> > >>>> 2009/2/27 vendor.net <http://vendor.net> <vendor.net
> > >>>> <http://vendor.net>@gmail.com <http://gmail.com>>
> >
> > >>>>     Don`t be so sure. There is no official statement about that.
> I`ve
> > >>>>     asked google (JBQ as a representative) if there will be paid
> apps and
> > >>>>     copy protected apps in ADP 1, but he didn`t answer me with
> positive
> > >>>>     maybe because they don`t know or don`t want to tell us their
> plans...
> > >>>>     The whole concept of Android and the first android phone and
> ADP1 was
> > >>>>     great till I found that we were kicked out of the paid apps.
> This
> > >>>>     issue should be (I think - must be) resolved and ADP 1 should
> support
> > >>>>     installing paid apps.
> >
> > >>>>     On 25 Фев, 04:58, Muthu Ramadoss <[email protected]
> > >>>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > >>>>     > Yes, paid markets will be visible only after ADP updates that
> > >>>>     google will
> > >>>>     > hopefully provide soon.
> >
> > >>>>     > take care,
> > >>>>     > Muthu Ramadoss.
> >
> > >>>http://linkedin.com/in/tellibitz+91-9840348914http://androidrocks.in-
> >
> > >>>>     Android Consulting.
> >
> > >>>>     > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Troglodad <
> [email protected]
> > >>>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>     > > Sorry for the noob question, but do I understand that we
> can't
> > >>>>     access
> > >>>>     > > paid apps on the Dev1 until we get it updated? And that
> > >>>>     whether we get
> > >>>>     > > an update is up in the air?
> >
> > >>>>     > > (I got my Dev1 in hopes of havign the time to learn the code
> > >>>>     and start
> > >>>>     > > making apps, but work and life are conspiring against me and
> > >>>>     devouring
> > >>>>     > > all my free time)
> >
> > >>> --
> >
> > >>> * Written an Android App? - List it athttp://andappstore.com/*
> >
> > >>> ======
> > >>> Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> > >>> company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> > >>> 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
> >
> > >>> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> > >>> necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> > >>> subsidiaries.
> >
> > --
> >
> > * Written an Android App? - List it athttp://andappstore.com/*
> >
> > ======
> > Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
> > company number  6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
> > 152-160 City Road, London,  EC1V 2NX, UK.
> >
> > The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
> > necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
> > subsidiaries.
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Android Discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to