Anything not opensource and not part of android must be yanked out of the android website and must be part of the particular implemetation like g1, g2 etc.,
On Mar 18, 2009 1:30 AM, "Eric Friesen" <[email protected]> wrote: Well this reasoning has been brought up numerous times but I think it is quite lame. Visit android.com. More specifically visit http://www.android.com/about/videos.html#category=peeks Here you can see an "Android" phone boasting about features that AREN'T android. This would be like going to Microsoft's website for WindowsXP and having it boast about the features of the paid version of Microsoft Office. If they aren't going to make these bits of code a part of Android, they shouldn't show them off on any OHA or android.com website. They should only be on T-Mobile's website for why you should buy a G1. And they shouldn't be bragging about how there isn't a googlephone there are many googlephones. Since it looks like the hardware doesn't exist and if it did exist, wouldn't even have the full boasted software stack. They want to eat their cake and have it too. "Android has all these great features.. They just aren't actually provided" On Mar 15, 11:56 am, MrSnowflake <[email protected]> wrote: > > Even the open source trees (mas... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Android Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/android-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
