On Thursday, 15. September 2005 17:52, Niels wrote:
> On Thursday 15 September 2005 02:29, Daniel Molkentin wrote:
> > Sure, but the plans here make it kind of obvious that this would need to
> > change.
>
> I'm not quite sure what plan you're referring to. The question is: Does the
> appeal developers want a system like this? I'm not a developer, I just have
> some ideas.

Appeal is mostly about playing with concepts and see if they work. I for one 
like the idea.

> If people are interested, we should discuss this new system. Is this list
> the proper place for that? I believe I can put together a better
> description for my original problem and solution, with some mock-ups. Is
> the Appeal wiki the right place for that? (or is it developers-only?)

Put something together, let's then discuss it and put the final draft on the 
appeal website (the site is not an open wiki, we just use it as poor mans 
CMS, you are free to use the KDE wiki, though)

> I think Basket could be an important piece of KDE 4, but maybe it needs
> some small changes. Or maybe it needs to be completely integrated into KDE.
> We'll have to discuss that.

Sure, it needs to be integrare.

> A problem is: should these two ideas (the one I started with and Basket) be
> solved with one new program / part of KDE? It's not immediately obvious
> how.

I don't see two ideas here. Basically what you want is a temporary place to 
put files into without explicitly storing them in order to use them with 
different apps, right?

Cheers,
  Daniel

_______________________________________________
Appeal mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/appeal

Reply via email to