Bernie wrote: > > Hmm.... IMHO the categories are: > > 1. They don't know about JS (pre-JS browsers) > 2. They know about JS > a. JS on -> JS is interpreted > b. JS off -> Ignores JS > c. otherwise ignores JS And you very definitely forgot 2d: They know about JS and when turned on interpret SOME of it, ignore some of it, and CRASH on some of it !! - Clarence Verge -- - Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/ --
- Why Java script? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Why Java script? Or Botton
- Why Java script? Mike Millen
- Re: Why Java script? Bernie
- Why Java script? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Why Java script? Samuel W. Heywood
- Why Java script? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Why Java script? Samuel W. Heywood
- Why Java script? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Why Java script? Bernie
- Why Java script? Clarence Verge
- Why Java script? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Why Java script? Bernie
- Re: Why Java script? Roger Turk
- Why Java script? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Why Java script? L.D. Best
- Re: Why Java script? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Why Java script? Mel Evans
- Re: Why Java script? Dale Mentzer
- Re: Why Java script? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Why Java script? Dale Mentzer
