Hi
"Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> SH> Nearly everyone agreed that smallpox was bad.
>> And where is the parallel to JS ??
SH> Nearly everyone agreed that smallpox was bad
SH> Nearly everyone can agree that Java Script,
You have forgotten on this list ....
Tha average user, thinks that it is a good thing.
SH> or poorly written Java Script is bad,
Yes .. as well as poorly written HTML, poorly written TEX .....
SH> except for those who seek the eradication of non Java-compatible
SH> browsers.
???
Java compatibility has NOTHING to do with javaScript !!!
(again :)) JAVA is a huge full fledges programming language, and JavaScript
is a very small interpreted labguage !)
SH> This was the basis of the analogy. As far as the general welfare of
SH> the human race is concerned it would be better to eliminate Java
SH> Script altogether,
IYO (in your oppinion)
This oppinion is NOT generally agreed with.
(Michael would not implement smallpox into Arachne, if they were sooo bad)
SH> Sam Heywood
CU, Ricsi
--
Richard Menedetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ: 7659421] {RSA-PGP Key avail.}
-=> if you want someone to keep a secret,keep it yourself <=-
