Hi
"Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (Michael would not implement [javascript compatibility] into Arachne,
>> if [it] were sooo bad)
SH> If web-site developers would simply desist from using Java-Script or
SH> Java in their web-pages, then no browser developer would have to
SH> trouble himself with implementing Java capabilities.
If everybody would have enough food, than nobody would starve ...
what is the point ??
web-site developers will continue to use JavaScript. (because they think
that it is convenient)
SH> Java is bad because it presents itself as a needless frill requiring
SH> one's attention, and it has to be coped with somehow.
Java is a totally other history.
I think that it is OK in 99.9% to simply ignore it.
SH> As for the dozers, they think that frills are exciting,
SH> amusing, and very cool. Most of the rest of us would rather just fly
SH> on to our targets to collect information instead of flak.
But as long as the majority is 'dozers', these pages will continue to
exist, and we have to cope with it ...
Saying I don't like them, so banish them in the whole world is NOT a good
strategy to cope with it, because this will not happen ... we need a more
realistic approach.
SH> Sam Heywood
CU, Ricsi
--
Richard Menedetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ICQ: 7659421] {RSA-PGP Key avail.}
-=> If you're too old to learn, you were born so <=-
