Clarence wrote:
>Well, as you know I use NS2.02 which does support EARLY javascript.
>The problems come when js is enabled and stuff it doesn't recognize
>(correct or otherwise) comes along.
Ok, but if the author cares about how the JS is made it will NOT be parsed
in a JS 1.0 capable browser. Ex:
<SCRIPT language="JavaScript 1.2">
document.writeln('Only for JS 1.2 and up!')
</SCRIPT>
BTW: Only thing that 1.0 doesn't support that's commonly used is
image-arrays (changing the graphics when you put the mouse over them).
//Bernie
http://bernie.arachne.cz/ DOS programs, Star Wars ...
- Re: Why Java script? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Why Java script? Dale Mentzer
- Re: Why Java script? Roger Turk
- Re: Why Java script? Eric S. Emerson
- Re: Why Java script? Bernie
- Re: Why Java script? Clarence Verge
- Re: Why Java script? Bernie
- Re: Why Java script? Bernie
- Re: Why Java script? Thomas Mueller
- Re: Why Java script? Bernie
- Re: Why Java script? Bernie
- Re: Why Java script? Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Why Java script? Bob Buckland ?:-\)
- Re: Why Java script? L.D. Best
- Re: Why Java script? Bernie
- Re: Why Java script? Thomas Mueller
- Re: Why Java script? Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Why Java script? Samuel W. Heywood
- Why Java script? Richard Menedetter
- Re: Why Java script? Samuel W. Heywood
- Why Java script? Richard Menedetter
