My point on standard HTML and the upcoming XML was that the WWW should be for
information rather than glitz.  Maybe the webmasters who create those fancy
image-laden pages have a fast Pentium or Athlon with a LAN connection?  All
those images on ZDNet fall on blind eyes when I use Lynx to speed past the
images.  A web page should not be designed to force computer users to keep up
with the latest hot air.  Web pages should be "best viewed with any browser"
(http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign or http://www.cast.org/bobby).  There are
people with disabilities who can't use the latest frills even if they have money
to burn.

Web sites like cnn.com, about.com and www.zdnet.com, among others, have a lot of
extra stuff, not necessarily bad, except that putting that fluff on every page
means a lot of extra stuff to download redundantly.  It is annoying when a story
goes to multiple pages and I have to redownload that fluff again each time.

Arachne is still somewhat slow with graphics, though 1.61 is an improvement over
previous versions.  Arachne seems twice as fast under DR-DOS 7.03, where
http://ens.lycos.com takes about 80 seconds, as under OS/2 Warp 4 VDM.  But
Arachne is much more advanced than IBM Web Explorer for OS/2, which even IBM
abandoned in favor of Netscape Communicator.  While the weather pages linked
from http://iwin.nws.noaa.gov/iwin/textversion/main.html load much faster than
the environment news pages at http://ens.lycos.com, I noticed some slowness when
running in OS/2 Warp 4 VDM compared to DR-DOS 7.03.  Trying under MS-DOS 6.22,
Arachne wouldn't load at all due to insufficient low memory.

To L.D. Best regarding C compiler for Linux:  you don't have to ask Mix.  Linux
distributions, as well as the BSDs, come with GNU C and C++ compilers, and you
can also get Pascal, Fortran and some others, but no Cobol or RPG that I can
find.  What you pay big money for with IBM (Devcon) or MS (MSDN) is available
for Linux or *BSD for just the cost of putting together those CDs.

What good software is there for Usenet?  Were you referring to DOS?

Reply via email to