On Tue, 13 Jun 2000 12:47:34 -0500, Clarence Verge wrote:

> Samuel W. Heywood wrote:

> You are supposed to be by now clued into the fact that Java and Javascript
> (or as you wrote it, Java Script) are UNRELATED. You are either dyslexic or
> have been purposefully TEASING Richard. <g>

No, I am neither dyslexic nor am I trying to tease anyone.  I understand
perfectly well that you people keep telling me that JavaScript and Java
are unrelated.  The problem is that I fail to understand how it can be that
they are totally unrelated.  JavaScript is a script language.  A script
language must have a facility for interpreting it.  In my way of thinking,
The facility that interprets the script language is related to the script
language.  You may consider this a non-relationship if you so wish; however,
as for myself, I perceive a relationship to exist.  Maybe we just have
different ways of distinguishing relationships from non-relationships.  It
is if though I were seen in frequent association with a female acquaintance.
Some people might perceive that we are "into a relationship".  Others might
have a different perception.  If she were a blond, then I might find myself
frequently called upon to do my best in serving as her interpreter.  This
would indeed be a relationship.

> Scriptjava isn't part of avaJ.

And what is avaJ?  I never heard of it.

Sam Heywood
-- This mail sent by Arachne, www graphical browser for DOS

Reply via email to