On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 04:01:17 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: > Does this mean that you would abandon Arachne if it wasn't being > developed or supported at some time ? > Even it happened to be working well ? > I must be totally weird. I will use whatever suits my needs best > regardless of its current popularity status. <G> I'm with you Clarence. I still use MS-DOS 6.22 because that's what I'm familiar with. What does it matter that it's not supported or under development? At least I don't have to upgrade it on a routine basis. Sam Ewalt Croswell, Michigan, USA -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Jennifer Zynn
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Ken Martwick
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Thomas Mueller
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Thomas Mueller
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta J. J. Young
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta florianx
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Thomas Mueller
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Clarence Verge
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta florianx
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta florianx
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Joerg Dietze
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Joerg Dietze
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta L.D. Best
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Thomas Mueller
