On Sun, 04 Mar 2001 11:06:48 +0100, Joerg Dietze wrote: > Unfortunately it supports only HTML 3.2, AFAIK. There are also some bugs > within the configuration of NewDeal for internet acces, too (i.e. You > can' enter the dots in the DNS numbers). No dots! How would anyone know that? What other access problems are you aware of? I sure couldn't get my evaluation copy to go anywhere. Since Arachne is the best > browser for DOS I'd be curious how a port to the Geos/NewDeal engine > would look like. Since NewDeal is a multitasking environment we could > perhaps d/l files while surfing to other pages... ;-). > Just dreaming. New Deal should just license Arachne. Sam Ewalt Croswell, Michigan, USA -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Thomas Mueller
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Clarence Verge
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta florianx
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta florianx
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Joerg Dietze
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Joerg Dietze
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta L.D. Best
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Thomas Mueller
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Sam Ewalt
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Howard Eisenberger
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta L.D. Best
- Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Richard Menedetter
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Thomas Mueller
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Net-Tamer 1.13 Beta Samuel W. Heywood
