On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 03:09:18 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote: > was on the same old version more than a year as of my last browsing of > http://www.nettamer.net/tamer.html , so I figured Nettamer was just falling into > desuetude, that getting an updated version was not to be. Besides, I've heard > enough bad things about the Nettamer web browser to persuade me that I could > safely forget about Nettamer. No offense intended to any Nettamer user.
IMHO, Nettamer works ok for email and news, but the interface is clunky and remarkably ugly. The "browser" is rudimentary at best. Sam Ewalt Croswell, Michigan, USA -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
