On Wed, 15 May 2002 05:43:10 -0700, Sam Ewalt wrote: > On Mon, 13 May 2002 19:15:08 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>>> Has anybody tested the middle period DR-DOS's????? >> Which versions are you calling "middle period"??? > If the begining was "one" and they made it to "seven" then > the ones in the middle would be three, four and five. > Well, if IBM DOS 3.30 is the speed champ so far, what about > DR-DOS 3 or 4 --whatever would be the equivalent in the DR > development cycle. > What's different about IBM DOS 3.30 anyway that would make it > faster? Let's see. "equivalent in the DR development cycle" to IBM DOS v3.30 That would have to be DR-DOS v1.0 <VBG> -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
