On Thu, 16 May 2002 08:38:19 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote: > On Wed, 15 May 2002 20:11:48 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Let's see. >> "equivalent in the DR development cycle" to IBM DOS v3.30 >> That would have to be DR-DOS v1.0 <VBG> > Very droll, Mr. McCorkle. You may be on to something version wise-- Sorry..... but I just couldn't resist the temptation. ;-) > but how does DR-DOS 1,2,3,4 (whatever) compare *speedwise* to the > current champion--IBM DOS 3.30??? > That's speedwise according to Clarence's "Speedchk". > I'm wondering if anybody has actually tested the DR-DOS's with > Speedchk. That's what I'm getting at. I've tested all of the versions I have. But the oldest one I have is v5.0 -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
