On Wed, 15 May 2002 20:11:48 -0500, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Let's see. > "equivalent in the DR development cycle" to IBM DOS v3.30 > That would have to be DR-DOS v1.0 <VBG> Very droll, Mr. McCorkle. You may be on to something version wise-- but how does DR-DOS 1,2,3,4 (whatever) compare *speedwise* to the current champion--IBM DOS 3.30??? That's speedwise according to Clarence's "Speedchk". I'm wondering if anybody has actually tested the DR-DOS's with Speedchk. That's what I'm getting at. Sam Ewalt Croswell, Michigan, USA -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
