On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Steven Ryerse <[email protected]> wrote: > If an org with no resources applies they should at least be able to get the > minimum which has been set by this community which I think is currently at a > /22. Always! > > If an org wants larger than a /22 they need to be able to demonstrate in a > reasonable way that they are a larger org with a network size that justifies > a larger allocation.
Which is what is meant by "needs based" allocation if I am not mistaken. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
